Occupation limits

Vermont Non-Compete Law (2026): Common law only; reform stalled

Vermont has no non-compete statute of general application, so the question of whether a covenant binds a worker is answered by a judge weighing the employer's asserted interest against the burden on the employee and on the public. One narrow prohibition exists in the licensing code: a school of barbering or cosmetology may not make a covenant not to compete a condition of enrolling a student for licensure training. Legislators spent the 2026 session working on a far broader ban and ran out of calendar before passing it.

Jurizmo Updated Current as of September 2026 All 50 states + DC

The rule

How Vermont treats non-compete agreements

The § 281(c) provision is easy to miss because it is buried in the school-approval section rather than in a restrictive-covenant chapter, and the pattern it targets — a training academy tying up its own graduates — is exactly the abuse that low-wage non-compete bills elsewhere were written to stop. H.205's fate is worth understanding precisely: it was not defeated on the merits, it was recommitted while the House looked for consensus, and the House Commerce Committee had already commissioned a January 2026 working report on the subject. Vermont is a plausible candidate to enact something in the next biennium.

If you are an employer

Vermont still lets you enforce a covenant that is proportionate to a real interest, but the House came within a floor vote of voiding most of them in 2026, so treat the current permissiveness as unstable and keep drafting tight.

If you are a worker

Your best argument in Vermont is that the restriction reaches further than anything your employer actually needs to protect, since no statutory threshold or time cap exists to help you.

ClassificationJudge-made reasonableness; one trade-school carve-out
Pay thresholdNone. Vermont has never adopted a pay floor for non-compete enforceability.
Maximum termNothing in statute. Length is one input into the court's overall reasonableness assessment, weighed together with geography and the scope of restricted activity.
Notice or considerationNo advance-notice or standalone-disclosure duty. Ordinary contract rules about consideration are the only formal constraint.
Primary statuteNo general non-compete statute. 26 V.S.A. § 281(c) prohibits barbering and cosmetology schools from conditioning training on a covenant not to compete; everything else is common law.

Detail

What has changed, and what is still moving

Legislation 2024–2026

Nothing enacted. The 2025-2026 biennium closed on May 29, 2026 without a general non-compete statute, leaving 26 V.S.A. § 281(c) — a provision that long predates the current reform wave — as the sole statutory prohibition on the books.

Bills to watch

No significant restrictive bills pending. H.205 came closer than any prior Vermont measure, clearing committee and reaching third reading in February 2026 before the House sent it back to committee on March 13 and the session expired around it. Any successor has to be reintroduced in the 2027 biennium.

Leading cases

Vermont Electric Supply Co. v. Andrus, 135 Vt. 190 (1977) remains the reference point, treating a post-employment restraint as enforceable only where it is needed to protect a legitimate employer interest and is not unreasonable in time, space or the activity it forecloses. Because there is no statute to construe, Vermont's non-compete doctrine is still built almost entirely out of equity decisions on injunctive relief.

If you have one in hand

What can make a non-compete unenforceable in Vermont

  • Your occupation is carved out. Judge-made reasonableness; one trade-school carve-out
  • The scope is wider than the interest behind it. A restriction that reaches beyond the customers, trade secrets or goodwill the employer can actually point to is the most common reason a covenant fails in Vermont.

Whether any of these applies turns on the wording of your own agreement, your role and the case law your court follows. This page maps the statutory landscape; it does not replace advice on a specific contract.

FAQ

Vermont non-compete questions

Are non-compete agreements enforceable in Vermont?

Vermont has no non-compete statute of general application, so the question of whether a covenant binds a worker is answered by a judge weighing the employer's asserted interest against the burden on the employee and on the public. One narrow prohibition exists in the licensing code: a school of barbering or cosmetology may not make a covenant not to compete a condition of enrolling a student for licensure training. Legislators spent the 2026 session working on a far broader ban and ran out of calendar before passing it.

How long can a non-compete last in Vermont?

Nothing in statute. Length is one input into the court's overall reasonableness assessment, weighed together with geography and the scope of restricted activity.

Is there a minimum salary for non-competes in Vermont?

No. Vermont sets no income floor, so pay alone does not decide whether a covenant binds you. The test is whether the restriction goes further than the employer's legitimate interest requires in time, geography and scope of work.

What notice or consideration does Vermont require?

No advance-notice or standalone-disclosure duty. Ordinary contract rules about consideration are the only formal constraint.

Sources

How this entry was checked

Check it against a third party

None of these is ours. If a figure here matters to a decision, verify it:

This page is general legal information published by Jurizmo and is not legal advice, does not create an attorney-client relationship, and may not reflect amendments enacted after the review date above. Consult a licensed attorney in the relevant state before acting on any agreement.